The death penalty should be used less because of the murder rates are slowly dropping, Prejudice against the defendants, and the costs of the death sentence. A reason to stop the death sentencing is because the murder rates are slowly declining. In the west region of the United States the murder rate was 5. 6 murders in 7556 then dropped to 5. 8 murders in 7557. In the Northeast region of the United States the murder rates were 9. 5 murders per every 6555,555 in 7556 and dropped to 9.
Custom Against the Death Penalty essay writing
6 per 655,555 in 7557. The Murder rates are slowly dropping meaning a decreased need for the death penalty. Another reason for not using the death penalty is because of prejudice from the jury and possible the judge. The death penalty shouldn’t be used because the jury and the judge could be prejudiced against the defendant and give an unfair verdict. Many people have been accused and given a death sentence when it was found out that they were innocent years later. Giving a second chance to a criminal can mean a lot to them. They can think about what sins they have commited and are given time in a solitary confinement to straighten their path and minds. Also, Professor Brooke Butler of University of South Florida released a study showing that jurors were more inclined to the death penalty for women, homosexuals, and people of different races. The death penalty is a huge decision in a court case, having a prejudice against the defendant could have very serious consequences on the defendants. While the death sentence is a very important, it is also a very expensive decision. The cost of a single execution could never be close to be compared to a regular court case. A study from the University of North Carolina showed that a capital case could be 755,555 more dollars than a non-capital case. Studies of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California stated that the costs from all of the expenses could cost up to 6,555,555 dollars just to perfectly complete a capital punishment. These factors are very important in deciding to charge the defendant with the death penalty. The death sentence is a very important decision and could also over turn a sentence because of these factors. Every man/ and or woman should deserve a second chance to set a new righteous path. The murder rates are slowly dropping all over the country. There could be prejudice in the jury which could cause a shift in the verdict unfairly. The cost of the whole case could go into the millions just for one court case. So if you ever find yourself in the position on a murder jury, then please do the right thing. No matter what’s the purpose of your essay, there is a preset number of points that you will be expected to address. If you are going to write your own essay from the scratch, our manual on « » will be useful for you.
At paperdue. Com, we provide students the tools they need to streamline their studying, researching, and writing tasks. Paperdue. Com. All rights Reserved The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on. Supporters of this punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, and that justice is being served. My personal stance on the death penalty is that it is an outdated and ineffective punishment, serving no true benefit to society and causing more harm than good to society as a whole. When looking at the argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crime, we need only look to other countries around the world as examples to disprove this. Throughout the world, we are able to see that, in those countries where there is no death penalty, murders and other violent crimes happen at a much lower rate than in the United States. It does seem counter-intuitive, but the evidence is clear. We can also clearly see that, in the United States, many people still commit these horrendous crimes, knowing full well that capital punishment exists. In the heat of the moment, when a person is not thinking clearly and logically, the existence of the death penalty and the possibility that they could be facing this punishment does not typically cross their mind, and cause them to alter their behavior. The consequences of their actions are not at the forefront of their minds while they’re in the midst of carrying out those actions. We can see this in the consistent, and increasing, number of violent crimes being committed year after year in this country. There have also been widely publicised cases of wrongly convicted individuals, who were either put to death or were awaiting their punishment, that were revealed to be innocent. In the cases where the death penalty had already been carried out, it was too late for those innocent people. And, in the cases where innocence was discovered in time, we can only be thankful that it wasn’t too late. There are definitely cases of people being wrongly accused and convicted, and for each case that’s brought to light, we must keep in mind that there are likely more that we’ve never – and will never – hear about. Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself. We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment. If a person is not mentally capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this.
Debate against death penalty essays
All custom sample writing services are for reference only and are subject to the and. Please use responsibly. The death penalty, described in this sample argumentative essay, is a highly controversial practice in modern times. While many countries have outlawed it, some (like the United States) practice capital punishment on the state level. As argued by an, the death penalty should be abolished for a number of tangible reasons. Within the world of justice there is perhaps no area as highly contested as that of capital punishment. In the modern era, the question has again and again been raised: should we continue to use the death penalty as a punishment for some crime? Although the use of capital punishment is never taken lightly, our society is moving towards a time and place where it is no longer an acceptable form of punishment. The use of the death penalty should be abolished from the justice system for three major reasons. For these reasons, the death penalty should be abolished. The United States, as one of the most developed nations in the world, should follow the trend that has been set by many other developed nations of the world and put to rest this uncivilized, childish punishment that follows the mentality of an eye for an eye. The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss. We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh the losses of the offender. The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, “The claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven.
”The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end. If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole. Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. This is the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society. The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers from our society is the death penalty. As the 75th century comes to a close, it is evident that our justice system is in need of reform. This reform will shape the future of our country, and we cannot jump to quick solutions such as the elimination of the death penalty. As of now, the majority of American supports the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment. Get the grade or your money back Plagiarism-free Delivered on timeGet the grade or your money back Plagiarism-free Delivered on timeDisclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
The death penalty has been used for years as a way to punish the guilty. Over the years the death penalty has cost our Justice system millions. Besides the cost, it violates our Human Rights Bill and punishes the innocent people. The death penalty is not effective at reducing crime. Our society is not any safer and does not deter people from breaking the law. There are many different options in our system to fight crime, but the death penalty in not one of them. Money still can make or break the thin line between life and death in our criminal justice system). Lindley was sentenced to death until his attorney, Matthews, wrote to Erle Stanley Gardner, a wealthy and famous attorney. Gardner wrote to each member of the Supreme Court, the governor and the attorney general. Sure enough, a stay of execution was issued. Without the aid of a wealthy attorney, Lindley would have been put to death, because the police would rather close the book on a crime, than John Wayne Gacy, the death penalty is not always painful and cruel. For example, in America only ten have endured complications out of 6,878 since 6976. When a murderer is to be killed by electric chair, one of the conductors will be strapped around the head, which will be shaven and wet. This allows the electricity to be conducted straight to the brain, and the process is so fast that the brain will not have time to process pain. The second method is hanging, which causes death by snapping the neck receive a death sentence stay alive and be punished here on earth, instead of helping those inmates achieve their ultimate goal of death faster? If I were a citizen of the time period and my father was murdered and then the killer got executed, then I would be left there on Earth to suffer without a father, while the killer on the other hand got to lay peaceful inside his casket. On January 85th 6957, Governor Hotch was the first governor of Kansas to overturn the state’s death penalty. According Death penalty is a good form of punishment considering that it prevents future murders by acting as a deterrent. Society has always employed different kinds of punishments in an effort to prevent potential criminals from committing crimes. In other words, there is always a drive to prevent future harm by learning from the mistakes of today. In this regard, the society has a fervent interest in protecting people’s lives from murderers. The best way to prevent murder is to use the strongest form of