Intolerance in any form is dangerous and unacceptable on the background of the growing power of modern means of destruction. The danger of intolerance has increased not due to the reason that it has become much more common, but because its representatives have received more destructive tools to implement their aggressive plans. Taking advantage of the spread of “political correctness”, intolerant society groups have moved into an aggressive attack. This is expressed, for example, in the strengthening of fundamentalism in the Arab riots in France, in an aggressive and arrogant behavior of intolerant minorities in many countries, in the moral asymmetry, when the Chechens are allowed to destroy the Russian population in Chechnya, and the Arabs may require the destruction of Israel, the Albanians may kill the Serbs, but a very limited power respond to this is subjected to sharp criticism. Further, we will summarize and analyze the articles of Jennifer Coleman and Iolo Madoc-Jones, devoted to religious and racial intolerance correspondently, and will demonstrate the examples of intolerance existing in the society of India and the UK. In her article “Authoring (in)Authenticity, Regulating Religious Tolerance: The Implications of Anti-Conversion Legislation for Indian Secularism”, Jennifer Coleman studies the politicization of conversion discourses in modern India, concentrating on the growing support of anti-conversion law at the level of separate states.
What Is Tolerance And How It Affects Us Philosophy Essay
Already in 6977, the Indian Supreme Court stated that the Constitution includes no right to turn another person into one’s faith. The statistics runs that in 7555, 676 inter-religious clashes occurred in India, in which 757 people were killed and 7,565 were wounded. During the last ten years, in Jammu and Kashmir regions, which are equally claimed by both India and Pakistan, more than 65 555 people were killed (Coleman 795-77). Starting from 6998, radical Hindu groups have constantly been carrying out acts of violence. On their account, in particular, is the destruction of West India churches on Christmas of 7555, as well as the murder of Australian missionary in January 7556.
In August September 7558, the representatives of Hinduism once again showed their true demonic appearance and burned, hanged, and raped the Christians, burned Christian churches, monasteries and homes of the faithful, and all this happened in full inaction by the authorities and the police, even worse the police themselves were engaged in violence (Coleman 795-77). Tolerance is one of man’s sterling virtues and civilization itself has its indebtedness to it. Arthur Helps has made a relevant comment in this context – ‘Tolerance is the only real test of civilization’. In a family tolerance establishes the cementing tie among its members. Various complications may arise there for various reasons.
The master of the house is to face them quite dispassionately and with tolerance. Thus, chaos makes room for cosmos and discord ends in a concordant note the house becomes a home of peace and harmony. In the sphere of religion the role of tolerance is of paramount importance. The celebrated writer and thinker like Victor Hugo observes – ‘Tolerance is the best religion’. It is the very essence of a religious faith to tolerate others.
If it fails to do so, it degenerates into fanaticism and fanaticism is underniably the grave of a religious cult. An ideology can never be forced upon a man. He accepts and follows one purely with his wisdom and independent things. Everybody has the freedom to think and believe and in this rational process, different persons are christened to different ideologies. One should remember that all political ideologies have the common goal to liberate man from the bondage of tyranny, exploitation and injustice.
The only difference that lies between them is the respective way to reach the target. The way which is the easiest and most pragmatic attracts and impresses the highest number. An ideology thrives and earns popularity in this process. Bearing this truth in mind a political activist should show tolerance in his dealings with the people. Thus, with tolerance the clashes may easily be avoided from the arenas of politics.
By definition, tolerance is a fair attitude toward people who opinions, race, or practices differ from your own. Tolerance is sometimes referred to as a democratic practice and is especially important for the highly diverse American nation. Tolerance, as an act, is the ability of a person to treat others equally and with due respect despite of any factors such as race or social position. Nevertheless, while the American nation is highly diverse, tolerance is rather a challenge because racism and discrimination are still common.